Comparison of the Effect of Enlarged Print VS a Hand Held Visolett Magnifier on Reading Performance in Fully Sighted Children
Naomi Roediger, BAppSci(Orth) 1
Sue Silveira, DipAppSc(Orth) MHealthScEd 2
1 Hunter Street Eye Specialists, Sydney, Australia
2 Discipline of Orthoptics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Introduction: The aim of this project was to determine if reading performance in terms of reading speed, accuracy and comprehension was affected by use of two low vision aids (LVA) a Hand-Held Visolett Magnifier (HHVM) and enlarged print.
Method: Data was collected from 21 students in year 4, all fully sighted. Their reading performance was assessed whilst reading with a HHVM, with enlarged print and without a LVA. Reading performance was assessed using the Ekwall and Shanker Reading Inventory, which included a measurement of reading speed, accuracy and comprehension.
Results: Students gained maximum reading speed and accuracy with the enlarged print and without a LVA. Reading with the HHVM caused a reduction in reading speed and accuracy, however there was no difference in the comprehension scores between the three conditions.
Discussion: The enlarged print allowed the students to demonstrate a higher level of reading speed and accuracy when compared to reading with the HHVM, primarily due to the influence of the device and the student’s inexperience as opposed to a reduction in the reading performance. This influence may be minimised with a period of training and adaptation to the HHVM. Reading comprehension was not affected when either the HHVM or enlarged print was used.
